In this blog, we explore the benefits of using Agile practices in project resource management compared to traditional methods.
In a recent blog post, How to Navigate Project Resource Management in the Face of Demand, I discussed the challenges in balancing project demand with team capacity and shared some approaches for improving project resource management. One of the approaches looked at using Agile practices.
By adopting Agile practices, organizations can navigate the complexities of demand and capacity planning with finesse and swiftly adapt to the ever-changing landscape of today’s business environment. In this blog post, I will dive deeper into the trade-offs, benefits, and methods of Agile to help improve project resource management.
The Differences Between Agile Resource Management and Traditional
Let’s first look at how Agile approaches the structure and interactions of teams and some of the key differences it has from a more traditional methodology (e.g., “waterfall”). Agile focuses on collaboration and adaptability, while a conventional approach emphasizes structure and predictability. Both have their merits and selecting the right one involves considering the organization’s existing structure for delivering projects and the specific context of each project.
How Agile Practices Improve Project Resource Management
Agile offers several benefits for planning and managing project resources. It provides flexibility, adaptability, and a focus on continuous improvement. It promotes a dynamic work environment where teams can pivot, experiment, and deliver value efficiently. Let’s look at some of these benefits in more detail.
- Increased Employee Input: Agile recognizes people work best when they have a stake in the game. It encourages active participation from team members, fostering a collaborative environment where everyone’s input matters.
- More Responsive to Customer Feedback: Agile emphasizes direct communication with end customers. Team members engage with users, understand their problems, and work toward solutions. Rather than rigidly following top-down plans, Agile teams pivot based on real-time feedback, resulting in better products and more ownership over work.
- Higher Job Satisfaction: Agile empowers team members by giving them autonomy and a sense of purpose. Job satisfaction increases when individuals feel connected to the project’s goals and have a say in decision-making. This positive work environment contributes to overall team morale and productivity.
- Faster Solutions: Agile’s iterative approach allows for quicker identification and resolution of issues. Frequent feedback loops enable teams to address problems promptly, leading to faster turnaround times and improved product quality and outcomes.
- More Cross-Functional Collaboration: Agile encourages collaboration across different roles and functions. Team members with different skill sets and experiences work closely together, sharing insights and expertise. This cross-functional collaboration enhances efficiency and creativity. It also fosters cross-development. The environment enables team members to learn from each other’s skills and experiences, which not only enhances individual growth but also strengthens team continuity over time.
- Better Risk Management: Agile projects break down work into smaller increments. This approach allows teams to assess risks early and adjust course as needed. By addressing risks incrementally, Agile minimizes the impact of potential setbacks.
Many organizations that use Agile teams keep the team members together for extended periods of time, working on multiple projects together. Establishing long-standing teams offers a few advantages. Over time, team members become familiar with each other’s strengths, weaknesses, and working styles. They can also refer to historical context, recalling past decisions, failures, and successes, preventing repeated mistakes.
The stable nature of these teams contributes to a steady pace of work, avoiding disruptions to workflows and project timelines, ultimately increasing productivity. This stability also encourages experimentation and allows deeper exploration and innovation.
Teams also often become more adept at estimating work. This improved estimation capability contributes to greater predictability in project timelines and outcomes, enhancing overall project management.
A Real World Example of Adopting Agile
An organization I worked with adhered to traditional, matrixed project team structures for many years. This approach introduced complexities that affected both team dynamics and project outcomes.
Dual Responsibilities
Project team members found themselves juggling multiple responsibilities. Not only did they handle project-specific tasks, but they were also responsible for ongoing activities like maintenance and operations. This dual role often led to conflicts in prioritization.
Tension Between Managers
Functional managers and project managers occasionally clashed due to shared team members. Both roles had crucial tasks that relied on the same individuals. As a result, team members were caught in the middle, trying to navigate conflicting priorities.
Stressful Decision-Making
Team members often faced the daunting task of deciding their priorities. The pressure to balance ongoing work with project-related tasks created stress and uncertainty.
Resource Allocation Challenges
Sometimes, ongoing work took precedence over project tasks, diverting resources away from critical projects. This resource allocation predicament resulted in delays and hindered project progress.
Long Hours and Urgency
In urgent situations, team members had to put in extra hours. They grappled with simultaneous demands from ongoing work and time-sensitive project deliverables.
To tackle these challenges, the organization adopted Agile team structures. They established dedicated, cross-functional Scrum teams — teams with the essential skills required to deliver software-related projects. These Scrum teams operated without the distraction of dual responsibilities and had a long-standing presence.
For skills occasionally needed but not present within these teams — like software integration — the organization formed single-function teams. These specialized teams could provide the necessary skills to the Scrum teams when required. To manage their work, they employed Kanban methods, allowing them to maintain a backlog that combined Scrum team support activities with their own project, enhancement, and maintenance tasks.
This well-organized structure enabled the organization to initiate projects promptly, minimized resource conflicts, improved project delivery efficiency, and enhanced satisfaction among project stakeholders and employees.
Move Forward with Agile Best Practices for Project Resource Management
Agile methodologies emphasize collaboration, adaptability and continuous improvement, creating a dynamic work environment that can swiftly respond to changing demands.
When organizations embrace Agile practices, they can use a self-organizing team structure, adaptable planning, continuous progress tracking, and decentralized decision-making to enhance project resource management. It’s important to maintain discipline and provide teams with the time they need to build trust with each other. Remember that merely adopting Agile practices does not guarantee their advantages and benefits.
Establish dedicated, cross-functional teams and maintain team continuity over extended periods to foster familiarity, sustain productivity, and drive innovation. Form Kanban Teams and use those methods to manage work and maintain a backlog that integrates Scrum team support activities with other tasks. Encouraging collaboration across diverse roles and functions to boost efficiency and stimulate creativity.
By implementing these insights, organizations can navigate demand and capacity complexities, enhance project delivery efficiency, and elevate stakeholder satisfaction.
Learn how to assess your organization’s aptitude for selecting the highest impact projects that maximize value return and optimize resource utilization. Read our white paper.
Want to learn more about our perspective on PMO’s or other topics related to Enterprise Portfolio and Program Management? Let’s talk
